Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

189558

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I support the proposed anaerobic digester project in CK because I believe it represents an important investment in our community’s future. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

189560

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I DO NOT agree that this project should move forward as is. Chatham-Kent council has NOT provided the community as a whole accurate details pertaining to the operational, environmental and health concerns. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

189562

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Thank you for listening to the people of Chatham. I live on the North side and Greenfield Ethanol currently produces a foul smell on a regular basis with the corn. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

189565

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Not interested in having this in our community. Chatham already has many environmental concerns that need to be addressed. No thank-you! Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

189566

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I think its a great idea. Alot of the comments I've seen from people who oppose it don't understand the process and certain municipal counselors have been fear mongering with incorrect information. Its a win win for the Municipality and the company. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

189567

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This will be detrimental to CK's infrastructure, having those vehicle running up and down the roads 24/7. Also the cost is astronomical for an already dying municipality. If it is such a great idea, why does Greenfield want a partner. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

189569

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I am strongly against having such a project so close to residential areas. I am not directly in the path of the stack but when I wind shifts, I cannot stay outside and enjoy my garden just from what is coming out of the stack now! Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

189571

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Why should small towns in Ontario suffer for the sake of waste disposal coming in 7 days a week on their small roads! Thamesville is now being targeted as well as Dresden! Are we the waste centre of Ontario? Who will be paying for the roads that all these trucks are going to Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

189573

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
What impact will this have on air quality, and what safeguards have been put in place to protect nearby residents and the environment? Are any accommodations or improvements being made to address the additional traffic on Bloomfield Road? Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

189577

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
As a resident of Chatham l am opposed to the preposal of an aenoroebic waste deposal site . I am concerned about how this would detrimentally effect our health,air quality ,,drinking water, water ways,as well the noise made by trucks and equipment to run this facility. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

189579

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This is a great idea, as it provides a revenue stream for the entire Municipality, helps to mitigate environmental concerns, without causing any negative consequences. Thank you Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

189580

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I believe this is a fantastic opportunity for the Municipality of Chatham-Kent. It is great for the environment as well as a financial net gain for CK tax paying residents.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

189582

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Public input into this project was never sought. The idea of processing human waste at this facility scares me and I fear water contamination due to the proximity of local waterways and the Thames River. Heavy trucks and traffic are a factor as well as noise and air quality. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

189583

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I believe if the municipalities creating the waste along with the people, businesses and industries that create the waste had to be responsible for the disposal and care of the waste that is generated by them within their own facilities as part of the cost of doing business or manufacturing or what Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

189584

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I’m totally against this . I feel this came up too quickly without our knowledge of any of it I feel it’s another back door deal our photo op major has made Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

189585

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
The facility would be located too close to the City of Chatham. I have concerns about the increased volume of traffic to/from the proposed site and the impact on municipal traffic. As well toxic chemicals still result from this process and would impact the city population. Lire davantage