I am an Ontario senior…

I am an Ontario senior deeply concerned about the economic and climate future of this province. I am particularly concerned that the language in the draft regulations for The Special Economic Zones Act puts too much discretionary power in the office of the Minister at a time when the Minister, and the government as a whole, is ignoring the climate emergency. The disproportionate reliance on the “opinion of the Minister” to make key determinations fundamentally undermines the process and the purpose of developing criteria, especially the criteria needed to mitigate climate breakdown.
The government’s recent history with programs and initiatives relying on Ministerial discretion rather than clear criteria is reason enough to argue for a comprehensive and measured process of evaluation independent of the Minister's opinion.
It was the opinion of a minister that rewarded certain Developers, friends of the government, with special treatment around Greenbelt lands—a situation still under investigation by the police. It was the opinion of a Minister that led to the situation where skills development funds were used to inappropriately support certain businesses, again those that were friends of the government.
The current draft regulation fails to provide clear and transparent criteria for the development of special economic zones and for the selection and conduct of those who plan to operate in the zone. Instead of objective measures the regulation relies on the “opinion of the Minister”.
The draft regulation is just over three pages. The phrase ‘in the opinion of the Minister’ or some variant is used seven times. Add in the sections referring to ‘the Minister is satisfied’ and situations that are “satisfactory to the Minister” and the number goes up. In fact, every substantive section defines the range, scope, and scale of what the Minister's opinion can determine. This is how democracy gets eroded, one minister’s opinion after another.
Of particular concern, the draft regulation allows the government to avoid proper consultation with First Nations. The environment minister has the authority to decide whether a “trusted proponent” has a plan for engaging and working with Indigenous communities. However, there is nothing that requires that the “trusted proponent” uphold Canada’s commitment to the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, and the duty to obtain free, prior and informed consent from Indigenous Peoples regarding initiation of projects.
The shortcomings of Bill 5 and the Special Economic Zones Act are not addressed by the draft regulation. The exemptions of designated projects to archaeological and environmental assessments are still there. The erosion of endangered species protections continues. The lack of transparency for mining claims remains a hallmark of the legislation. Bill 5 and the Special Economic Zones Act bypasses rights to consultation of both Indigenous peoples and the general public and the draft regulation reinforces this troubling development.
The draft regulation fails to protect the public interest. The draft regulation undermines provincial action on the climate emergency.