Commentaire
The recommended wildlife tree density of 100–150 living poplar and birch may cause undue harm to the hardwood mills in Northwestern Ontario. It appears that the rational for this change is to address areas where there is the inability to market poplar and birch.
Perhaps consider:
- Removing the hardwood wildlife tree maximum and allowing hardwood and conifer strategies to be managed at the regional and district level.
- If the above consideration is intolerable, restrict the application of the 100–150 trees per hectare guideline to regions where there is no viable market for poplar and white birch.
- Clearly state in the Stand and Site Guide that this recommendation should only be implemented in market-absent situations and require approval from affected mills before applying the guideline.
- Include a maximum conifer wildlife tree density to address conifer-absent markets. Particularly in regions like Northwestern Ontario where market conditions have changed due to mill closures, such as the Ear Falls and Ignace sawmills.
Soumis le 15 janvier 2026 10:54 AM
Commentaire sur
Révision du Guide de gestion forestière pour la conservation de la biodiversité à l’échelle du peuplement et du site (Guide sur les peuplements et les sites)
Numéro du REO
019-9217
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
182001
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire