Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

182494

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
With the Region of Waterloo having a water capacity issue, I do not think this is the appropriate time to approve of any water taking permits. All permits should be denied until this is resolved. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

182499

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
*I am a resident concerned about the Esbaugh Sand and Gravel PTTW. This is a Category 3 application, which is the highest risk level. I am specifically worried that taking 9.7 million litres of water per day will dry up local wells near monitoring stations K50, K51, and K52. Please deny Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

182501

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
As an active member of Citizens For Safe Groundwater, I adamantly oppose this proposal. We fought hard for years to not allow this gravel pit into our vibrant farming community. We fought hard to protect our water. Wilmot council at the time supported our decision and stood with the community. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

182502

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I came across this when trying to look up what Permits to Take Water exist in Waterloo Region, since there is a water crisis going on. Is it is wise to have a Category 3 water permit on top of Waterloo Region’s Recharge Zone? Should we add risk to the groundwater? Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

182506

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
"I am a resident concerned about the Esbaugh Sand and Gravel PTTW. This is a Category 3 application, which is the highest risk level. I am specifically worried that taking 9.7 million litres of water per day will dry up local wells near monitoring stations K50, K51, and K52. Please deny Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

182518

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Based on the fact that I am a resident in Wilmot Township, this a request for a category 3 permit and there is a water provision shortage in Waterloo Region, I recommend a rejection of this permit request. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

182522

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Waterloo Region is in the middle of a water supply crisis. This is an insane request to be making - never mind approving. Water for washing gravel that then becomes industrial sewage is the absolute least important use for our precious water. This request needs to be denied.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

182524

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
As a tax-paying member I STRONGLY refute the approval of this proposal. At a time where our water supply is a concern, approving this application would show a complete and blatant disregard for the homeowners in the region.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

182527

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I am a resident of Waterloo region. In a time where we are struggling to meet community water demands, processing a permit for a gravel company to take more of our water seems illogical and irresponsible. Please vote NO, to this permit!!!

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

182531

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
With the Region of Waterloo currently experiencing a water crisis, I believe this would severely impact our water further. It would be irresponsible to permit this to go through when currently there is a hold on future development until the water crisis is solved.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

182532

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Please reject this application - the aquifer provides drinking water for hundreds of thousands of people in Kitchener - Waterloo - Cambridge and it's already severely stressed to the point where there's a de facto freeze on new housing. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

182536

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
The Region of Waterloo is short 3% of the water we use daily and we have no buffer in the event of equipment breakdown, fire, or contamination. The company has not proposed filtering the water (which otherwise becomes industrial waste), nor reusing the water. Lire davantage