Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

182599

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
"I am a resident concerned about the Esbaugh Sand and Gravel PTTW. This is a Category 3 application, which is the highest risk level. I am specifically worried that taking 9.7 million litres of water per day will dry up local wells near monitoring stations K50, K51, and K52. Read more

Comment ID

182600

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
"I am a resident concerned about the Esbaugh Sand and Gravel PTTW. This is a Category 3 application, which is the highest risk level. I am specifically worried that taking 9.7 million litres of water per day will dry up local wells near monitoring stations K50, K51, and K52. Read more

Comment ID

182603

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
"Category 3: water takings are anticipated to have the highest potential of causing unacceptable environmental impactor interference"... A Category 3 proposal shouldn't be even considered while the Region of Waterloo is in a water crisis! Unacceptable is right there in the terms. Read more

Comment ID

182616

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The approval of a water taking permit for the Shingletown gravel pit is a disaster in the making. Our farm is about 2,600 meters from this gravel pit where we have already seen the lowering of the water table since it recently began operations. Read more

Comment ID

182619

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am a resident concerned about the Esbaugh Sand & Gravel PTTW. This is a category 3 application which is the highest risk level. I am specifically worried that taking 9.7 litres of water per day will dry up local wells near monitoring stations K50, K51 & K52. Please deny this 10 yr permit.

Comment ID

182680

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
If this is to be accepted high scrutiny should be in place on the disposal of this water. If it is to reenter the water supply after use the company should be taxed for the additional cost of cleaning the dirty water to remove harsh chemicals. Read more

Comment ID

182685

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
At a time when the Region of Waterloo is at high risk of depleting its aquifers and running out of drinking water, the idea of allowing yet another gravel pit to take up to 9,720,000 litres of water per day to wash stones is absolutely absurd. This water taking permit must be denied.

Comment ID

182705

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The water takings are most probably to cause unacceptable environmental impact and interference. This is unacceptable for our long term health in this community. Please stop for profit environmental destruction for children and their children. Make them find alternatives

Comment ID

182732

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The water table is a precious commodity to be stewarded with future generations in mind and now even the current generation has water insecurity due to thoughtless disregard by government and developers. When will conservation truly be conservation? Read more

Comment ID

182735

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Hello, I am a resident from just outside of Waterloo Region. Our local water supplies are linked with the region through the Grand River Watershed. This Watershed is already showing signs of much lower volume than previous times. Read more

Comment ID

182744

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Water is life: for people and for the more than human life! We need to prioritize water for drinking, sustenance and as part of the water cycle. The river systems provide life far beyond the waters or the shores and we need to preserve life. Read more