Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

157810

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Any changes to existing laws should not happen without relevant and current scientific documentation and data supporting the humaneness and necessity of proposed practices. Regulatory ease or trapper convenience are secondary to animal welfare concerns. Read more

Comment ID

157812

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am opposed to any regulation changes that do not have strong peer reviewed scientific studies behind them. What are the scientific reviews that show that this is good for the environment and for the welfare of wildlife, which should be a priority? Read more

Comment ID

157815

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The government must provide full scientific documentation, environmental impact assessments, and data to support its claims. It should also consider extending the public comment period to allow stakeholders time to review this information and provide informed feedback. Read more

Comment ID

157816

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Small financial gains for the fur trade should never come at the expense of animal protection, public safety, or ecological health. As well, Beavers are keystone species that create wetlands, support biodiversity, and regulate water systems. Read more

Comment ID

157817

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Laws around trapping need to prioritize animal welfare and should be informed by current, peer-reviewed science. Small financial gains for the fur trade should never come at the expense of animal protection, public safety, or ecological health. Read more

Comment ID

157818

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
To ensure transparency and accountability, the government should make all relevant scientific data, including environmental assessments, publicly available to support its decisions. Read more

Comment ID

157821

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Fur dealer reports are an important regulatory tool for ensuring compliance with humane trapping standards and environmental protections. Loosening these requirements reduces transparency and public accountability.they carry serious risks that cannot be ignored. Read more

Comment ID

157826

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Although the government claims these changes will promote humane trapping and help manage wildlife conflicts, they carry serious risks that cannot be ignored. Expanding trapping and allowing more methods for killing increases the risk of suffering for both target and non-target species. Read more

Comment ID

157830

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
All claims must have proof to back them up and must be made public. To make such changes to reduce administrative burden is essentially relieving yourselves of any accountability or responsibility. This is your responsibility and you cannot just walk away from it. Read more

Comment ID

157831

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I have strong concerns about the reduction in regulations to trapping in Ontario. Laws around trapping need to prioritize animal welfare and should be informed by current, peer-reviewed science. Read more

Comment ID

157834

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am writing to strongly oppose the Ontario government’s proposed changes to trapping regulations. While these are framed as efforts to “streamline rules” and “reduce burdens,” in reality they would weaken protections for animals, ecosystems, and public transparency. Read more

Comment ID

157840

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I object to the proposed changes. Please improve transparency around this proposal. The government must provide full scientific documentation, environmental impact assessments, and data to support its claims. Read more

Comment ID

157854

Commenting on behalf of

Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters Membership (OFAH Membership) is Ontario’s largest, non-profit, fish and wildlife conservation-based organization, representing 100,000 members, subscribers and supporters, and 675 member clubs. Read more

Comment ID

157856

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I strongly oppose the proposed changes to Ontario’s trapping regulations. The government’s framing of these changes as “streamlining” and “reducing administrative burdens” does not reflect the very real risks they pose to animal welfare, environmental protection, and public accountability. Read more

Comment ID

157862

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The government must provide full scientific documentation, environmental impact assessments, and data to support its claims. It should also consider extending the public comment period to allow stakeholders time to review this information and provide informed feedback. Read more

Comment ID

157867

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The government needs to back its claims with full scientific data, environmental assessments, and transparent documentation. Extending the public comment period would give people a fair chance to review and respond. Read more