Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

97007

Commenting on behalf of

City of Vaughan

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Through our comments on the ERO posting, the City will be looking for guidance from the Province on the following: • How engagement with Indigenous Communities will be fulfilled for infrastructure projects that do not follow the MPAP process. Read more

Comment ID

97025

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This proposed new regime removes virtually all protection for our cultural heritage and natural environment so that houses, bridges and highways can be built faster. Citizens won’t even be able to appeal to the government and all concerns will need to be directed to the development proponent. Read more

Comment ID

97028

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Doug Ford: Ontario didn’t start with you. Have some consideration for this province’s First Nations and many years of rich historical artifacts which are worth studying and protecting. It’s not just about money! Read more

Comment ID

97060

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am writing because I stand with the comments made by the Ontario Archaeological Society, Chippewa of the Thames First Nation, and Mississaugas of the Credit First Nation regarding the proposed “streamlined “ process of development in Ontario. Read more

Comment ID

97061

Commenting on behalf of

Greater Ottawa Home Builders' Association

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Please accept the attached from the Greater Ottawa Home Builders’ Association (GOHBA) and its members as a submission to the government’s request for feedback on ‘New Regulation to focus municipal environmental assessment requirements’ (ERO 019-7891 / 23-MECP025). Read more

Comment ID

97079

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This proposal seems very dangerous to archaeology, First Nations history and rights, and of course the environment. If there are going to be replacements, the public needs to see them and understand exactly what kind of transition there will be. Read more

Comment ID

97082

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
In a time when we are facing multiple overlapping crisis (biodiversity, and climate to name the two most relevant to this legislation) it is UNCONSCIONABLE that The Ministry of Environment is washing its hands of any responsibility for care-taking our natural and cultural heritage environment. Read more

Comment ID

97099

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
the Ministry is downloading its duty to care for the Environment to municipalities without guiding, supporting, or supervising the process. - the proposal removes the need to investigate and mitigate impacts on cultural heritage resources, for most municipal infrastructure projects Read more

Comment ID

97109

Commenting on behalf of

Williams Treaties First Nations

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
While Williams Treaties First Nations have identified several immediate concerns with the proposal explained in this letter, the 30-day time frame provided makes it unfeasible to fully evaluate the implications of excluding 87 types of projects from the municipal environmental assessment process and Read more

Comment ID

97110

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Page 2 This proposed change to the EA process does not provide sufficient protection for cultural heritage and archaeological resources as well as ancestor burials. Removal of the current regulations that trigger heritage and archaeological assessments in advance of Read more

Comment ID

97112

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
The proposed legislation will only make it easier for municipalities to write off areas of archaeological potential (and which some have already been doing), including pre and post contact settlement and burial sites, undermining the work of the archaeological profession and destroying valuable heri Read more