Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

96991

Commentaire fait au nom

P Becker Consulting

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
The MCEA should not be revoked but instead should be updated. While the Environmental Assessment Act has been around for 50 years the MCEA has only been in place for approximately 30 years. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

97007

Commentaire fait au nom

City of Vaughan

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Through our comments on the ERO posting, the City will be looking for guidance from the Province on the following: • How engagement with Indigenous Communities will be fulfilled for infrastructure projects that do not follow the MPAP process. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

97011

Commentaire fait au nom

The Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Please accept the attached letter as the Municipality of Clarington's comments on the proposed changes to the EA Act as per ERO-019-7891. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

97025

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This proposed new regime removes virtually all protection for our cultural heritage and natural environment so that houses, bridges and highways can be built faster. Citizens won’t even be able to appeal to the government and all concerns will need to be directed to the development proponent. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

97028

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Doug Ford: Ontario didn’t start with you. Have some consideration for this province’s First Nations and many years of rich historical artifacts which are worth studying and protecting. It’s not just about money! Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

97053

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I object to this proposal. It will cause much environmental and archaeological damage, which cannot be undone. Environmental and archaeological surveys are important and should continue to be held.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

97060

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I am writing because I stand with the comments made by the Ontario Archaeological Society, Chippewa of the Thames First Nation, and Mississaugas of the Credit First Nation regarding the proposed “streamlined “ process of development in Ontario. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

97061

Commentaire fait au nom

Greater Ottawa Home Builders' Association

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Please accept the attached from the Greater Ottawa Home Builders’ Association (GOHBA) and its members as a submission to the government’s request for feedback on ‘New Regulation to focus municipal environmental assessment requirements’ (ERO 019-7891 / 23-MECP025). Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

97079

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This proposal seems very dangerous to archaeology, First Nations history and rights, and of course the environment. If there are going to be replacements, the public needs to see them and understand exactly what kind of transition there will be. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

97082

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
In a time when we are facing multiple overlapping crisis (biodiversity, and climate to name the two most relevant to this legislation) it is UNCONSCIONABLE that The Ministry of Environment is washing its hands of any responsibility for care-taking our natural and cultural heritage environment. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

97098

Commentaire fait au nom

Ontario Rivers Alliance

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
The Ontario Rivers Alliance (ORA) is a not-for-profit grassroots organization with a mission to protect, conserve and restore riverine ecosystems in Ontario. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

97099

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
the Ministry is downloading its duty to care for the Environment to municipalities without guiding, supporting, or supervising the process. - the proposal removes the need to investigate and mitigate impacts on cultural heritage resources, for most municipal infrastructure projects Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

97104

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This recent proposal is very concerning, this new model does not provide sufficient protection for archaeological heritage and Ancestor burials. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

97109

Commentaire fait au nom

Williams Treaties First Nations

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
While Williams Treaties First Nations have identified several immediate concerns with the proposal explained in this letter, the 30-day time frame provided makes it unfeasible to fully evaluate the implications of excluding 87 types of projects from the municipal environmental assessment process and Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

97110

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Page 2 This proposed change to the EA process does not provide sufficient protection for cultural heritage and archaeological resources as well as ancestor burials. Removal of the current regulations that trigger heritage and archaeological assessments in advance of Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

97112

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
The proposed legislation will only make it easier for municipalities to write off areas of archaeological potential (and which some have already been doing), including pre and post contact settlement and burial sites, undermining the work of the archaeological profession and destroying valuable heri Lire davantage